Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pittsburg County approves $280,446.49 in claims and blanket purchase orders

Board of County Commissioners, Pittsburg County · April 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved claims, transfers, monthly reports and a detailed docket of purchase orders and vendor warrants totaling $280,446.49 for April 6, 2026, and authorized multiple blanket purchase orders for county departments.

Pittsburg County commissioners approved claims, transfers and monthly reports and authorized blanket purchase orders during the April 6 meeting, signing a vendor and purchase-order docket that lists a grand total of $280,446.49 for FY 2025-2026 dated April 6.

The clerk’s packet contains detailed purchase orders and warrants across multiple departments — including Animal Shelter, Expo, Highway, Rural Fire and Jail — and highlights a Highway Sales Tax Asphalt Plant total of $76,057.11 among larger line items. The board voted unanimously to approve payment of the presented claims and to authorize transfers and monthly officer reports.

Chairman Ross Selman moved to approve payment of purchase orders after review and prior signature; Charlie Rogers seconded. The board recorded the vote as AYE: Ross Selman, Mike Haynes, Charlie Rogers; NAY: none.

Why it matters: The approvals release county funds to vendors for routine operations and capital items. The detailed warrant list in the packet includes vendor names, PO numbers and departmental account codes used for auditing and public transparency.

The meeting packet includes itemized line-by-line warrants and vendor invoices (pages printed by County Clerk Hope Trammell) and the clerk recorded the grand total at the end of the packet. No substantive debate was reported on the items during the meeting.