Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Through The Fence Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board urged to rescind recommendation on 'through‑the‑fence' fees amid legal and FAA compliance concerns
Summary
At the April 16 Erie Airport advisory board meeting a committee member asked the board to resend its recommendation on resident "through‑the‑fence" fees, saying the proposed structure could expose the town to litigation and FAA compliance complaints; the board invited HOA input and agreed to revisit the item.
A committee member asked the Erie Airport Economic Development Advisory Board on April 16 to resend or reverse the board's prior recommendation on resident "through‑the‑fence" fees, saying the recommendation could leave the town exposed to litigation and possible Federal Aviation Administration compliance complaints.
The request was read into the record during general discussion by a committee member. "The current recommendation ... may fail to adequately protect the town from litigation risk and may fail to adequately protect the airport from potential FAA airport compliance complaints," the Committee member said, asking that the board reconsider the resident fee portion separately from commercial fee changes so staff and council could frame a recommendation that reduced legal and regulatory exposure.
Why it matters: the board's recommendations will be forwarded to town council for approval, and several members emphasized that the council and town attorneys must complete legal review. The Chair said the board does not have access to legal counsel for this matter and "insisted that the town staff and the town attorneys run this to ground" before the recommendation is finalized, framing the rescind request as a way to ensure due diligence rather than to block changes.
A public commenter who identified themself as the vice president of the Erie Airpark HOA asked when the fee proposal would go to council and urged engagement by HOA members. The Vice President, Erie Airpark HOA, said residents wanted clarity on timing and potential impacts and welcomed the board's invitation to present at a future noticed meeting.
Board members debated who among residents were raising objections. One board member said about 33 of roughly 100 HOA houses currently pay a through‑the‑fence fee, and members noted objections came both from residents already paying and from those newly subject to fees. The numbers were discussed in the meeting as an approximation by members.
Budget context and next steps: board members referenced an airport revenue shortfall discussed in the meeting (members mentioned figures in the range of about $150,000 to $170,000) and said the fee proposal aims to move the airport toward revenue neutrality in a phased manner. The Chair and other members said the council retains authority to accept some recommendations and reject others and that rescinding the recommendation could prompt staff and attorneys to reframe options for council consideration.
Procedural outcome: a motion to record the four individuals the board had selected at the prior meeting in the minutes was proposed earlier in the meeting but failed to receive a second, so the board did not take formal action to change the minutes at this meeting. The board agreed it could place the through‑the‑fence issue on the next agenda as a noticed item and invited an HOA representative to present with advance notice.
The advisory board did not take a final vote on rescinding its prior recommendation at the April 16 meeting; members said the item will return for further discussion after staff and legal review and after the council-level process advances.
