Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Plastic Pollution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts ‘Skip the Stuff’ law after heated debate over fines, exemptions and practical impacts
Summary
After extended floor debate and multiple failed amendments, the Colorado House adopted Senate Bill 146, expanding the state's plastic-pollution rules to prohibit automatic inclusion of single-use food-service items with takeout and delivery orders; debate focused on enforcement, small-business impacts, farmers-market and school exemptions, and proposed carve-outs.
The Colorado House on May 5 adopted Senate Bill 146, known at floor debate as the "Skip the Stuff" bill, which extends existing plastic-pollution reduction measures and generally prohibits retail food establishments, and third-party delivery services, from automatically including single-use food-service items (utensils, napkins, condiments, straws and similar items) with delivery or carryout orders unless customers request them.
Sponsor Representative Froelich said the bill builds on prior plastic-pollution legislation and reflects student-led advocacy: "It has been dubbed 'skip the stuff.' It just adds to our previous plastic pollution reduction ban that was passed in 'twenty one,'" Froelich told the House, describing the bill as focused on common, convenience items that repeatedly end up in the waste stream.
Floor debate was lengthy and at times pointed. Representative Bradley and other opponents warned that the bill's enforcement provisions — including first-offense fines and escalating penalties — and certain statewide mandates could harm small businesses, food trucks and farmers markets. Bradley urged an opt-in approach and repeatedly proposed amendments to carve out farmers markets, roadside stands and other small vendors; those amendments were debated and several were rejected by the chamber.
Supporters, including Rep. Soper and others from rural districts, argued for narrow exemptions where practical (for example, hospitals, school cafeterias, and certain institutional settings are already carved out in the bill) but said the statewide standard would shift consumer expectations and reduce waste. "If you think about it, it's a barter for exchange... the minute you walk away and then you go, 'Oh shoot, I really could have used some utensils,' that's something to where, to punish that vendor, with an egregious fine, is pretty mind boggling," Soper said while supporting a farmers-market exemption amendment.
The House considered a series of Bradley amendments (including L014, L012 and related proposals) to make the requirement optional or to carve out farmers markets and roadside stands; those amendments failed on roll-call votes. Other floor amendments addressing enforcement cadence and warning periods were introduced and rejected. The House ultimately adopted the bill after full debate and multiple votes on amendments.
Sponsors said the goal is behavioral change — to normalize asking for utensils and condiments and to reduce the single-use items that become municipal waste — while opponents argued the bill imposes enforcement burdens that could hit small vendors hardest.
What's next: The bill was adopted by the House and will proceed to final readings and reconciliation steps as required. Implementation will depend on local enforcement choices and any rulemaking by affected agencies.
