Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Fiscal Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee rejects SB 67 after debate over fiscal effects on campuses
Summary
Senate Committee on Appropriations debated fiscal impacts of SB 67 and adopted amendments intended to eliminate a fiscal note; the committee chair announced the bill failed on a 4–3 vote after roll call, and the committee recorded a reverse roll call for the formal disposition.
Get email alerts on the Budget And Fiscal Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Committee on Appropriations considered Senate Bill 67, heard questions about its fiscal impacts on public institutions and adopted amendment L3 intended to eliminate the fiscal note, then debated and voted on the amended bill.
Committee members raised concerns that even with L3 the bill could shift costs to higher-education institutions. Senator Liston asked for a new fiscal note to quantify costs to the University of Colorado Colorado Springs and Colorado State University. Senator Bridges and others said the committee packet and amendment language indicated L3 reduces the fiscal note to zero and that L5 would only delay implementation by a year.
After discussion, Senator Bridges moved SB 67 as amended. The clerk read a roll call and the chair announced, “That bill fails on a vote of 4 to 3.” The committee then completed a reverse roll call and recorded the disposition.
Because the transcript’s roll-call entries and the announced tally show an inconsistency (the clerk’s line-by-line roll call in the transcript appears to record a different per-member vote total than the chair’s announced 4–3 result), the committee record may require clarification from the clerk for a definitive per-member tally.
The committee moved on after placing the bill on the committee’s procedural disposition (recorded in the transcript as a reverse roll call).
