Citizen Portal

Committee preserves remote-supports option after debate

Minnesota Legislature Joint Human Services and Health and Human Services Committees · May 5, 2026

Summary

Senators backed amendment A12 to retain remote supports and monitoring technology as a community-based option for people with disabilities, while DHS raised concerns about program-integrity safeguards and documentation; the amendment passed informal committee scrutiny and will be folded into the working bill.

Senators on the joint Human Services and Health and Human Services committees voted informally to carry forward amendment A12, which would preserve remote supports and monitoring technology as an option for people receiving services in community residential settings.

Senator Fata, sponsor of A12, said the amendment removes statutory language that would have repealed remote supports and instead inserts oversight language requiring providers and third-party monitoring entities to meet emergency-response-time ratios. "Remote supports and monitoring technology is safe, is cost effective, and it is person centered," Fata said, adding that the change would protect people who rely on services that allow them to remain at home without 24-hour staff.

Christy Grama of DHS said the agency had program-integrity concerns and would need to review how to document appropriateness for remote services; Grama warned the amendment could "undermine the governor's position" and asked for technical work with providers to avoid unintended consequences.

Supporters emphasized access across Minnesota and the workforce shortage in direct care: "Remote services is the future...We are running out of human beings," Senator Abler said during debate.

Committee members reported strong informal support during the roll call and said the A12 language will be incorporated into the consolidated draft for further work with DHS and stakeholders.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source