Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensing Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers advance change-of-ownership carve-outs to licensing moratoria
Summary
Joint committee members advanced several amendments (A8, A9, A10) to a broad human-services package that would allow change-of-ownership licenses to proceed during temporary moratoria on new licenses, while keeping background checks and qualification requirements in place.
Get email alerts on the Licensing Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A joint hearing of the Minnesota Senate Human Services and Health and Human Services committees advanced amendments intended to preserve continuity of care when provider ownership changes while a licensing moratorium is in effect.
Senator Abler, sponsor of the A8 amendment, told the committees the changes are narrow: they would prevent a commissioner from denying a change-of-ownership license or a temporary transitional license solely because a moratorium on new licenses exists. "It just counts as change and all the criteria," Abler said, noting new owners would still have to pass background checks and other qualification steps.
Legal counsel clarified for members that much of the A8 text mirrors language already in the underlying bill and that the new sentences explicitly bar the commissioner from refusing a change-of-ownership license in certain circumstances. Counsel said the amendment also applies the same carve-out to other moratoria enacted previously and to the governor's proposed moratorium on new ICS settings.
Christy Grama of the Department of Human Services said DHS was still reviewing the amendments and asked for time to analyze unintended consequences, but added the department is generally committed to working with the committee to keep essential ICS capacity in communities. "We definitely wanna make sure that as it relates to ICS capacity in the community, this is a really important service," Grama said.
Proponents pressed examples where the carve-out would help preserve services — for example, when ownership transfers because an owner dies and a family member seeks to assume operations. Opponents did not press to kill the amendments; the committee conducted informal roll calls and sponsors reported support, indicating the provisions will be carried into the working "delete-everything" draft for further technical work.
Next steps: sponsors said they will continue to refine the language with DHS staff and fold adopted amendments into the consolidated bill text for later committee and conference consideration.

