Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Aransas Pass for apology and better communication after release of long-running missing-persons files
Summary
Multiple residents told the council that recent geoforensic disclosures about a decades-old disappearance are insufficient without formal apologies and sustained victim notifications; they called on the police department to pursue viable leads and comply with the Texas Crime Victims' Bill of Rights.
Get email alerts on the Police Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the council's public-comment period, two residents asked the city and the Aransas Pass Police Department to do more than release files in the decades-old Roberson/Robinson disappearance.
Kathleen Holland told the council she appreciated the APPD's release of geoforensic results but said the family had not yet received full case files as expected and that "a transfer of information is not a transfer of responsibility." She pressed the department and Chief Perkins to pursue viable leads and to provide the legally required notifications under the Texas Crime Victims' Bill of Rights.
Darlene Min, who identified herself and said she was speaking about the 1989 disappearance of Blanca Elisa Roberson, thanked the council for releasing a formal statement and the case files but said the statement failed to include new clarity and an apology for past mistakes. "There was no apology for the 10 years wasted while this case was stagnant nor for the gross mishandling of the 2016 investigation," Min said, and urged ongoing transparency and adherence to victims'rights statutes.
City staff and council members responded in the meeting by describing logistics and court-order constraints around transferring files. One staff speaker explained the city could not forward files until a signed court order was received and said staff would work to ensure the family received the materials. The council did not take any enforcement or personnel action at the meeting, but the public comments made clear community demand for formal acknowledgment of past errors and continued investigative updates.
Why it matters: Residents noted statutory victim-notification rights and asked the city to meet both procedural duties and public expectations for accountability. The comments put pressure on APPD leadership and the city manager to document and publicly explain next steps, and they may shape follow-up requests to staff or future agenda items.
Next steps: Council acknowledged the remarks and staff said they would follow up on the logistics of delivering the files to the family and keep the council and family advised of further developments. The council did not vote on policy changes or personnel matters during open session.

