Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surety Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate amendment would let providers post surety bonds to free withheld Medicaid payments; members debate costs and access
Summary
Amendment A6 would let providers subject to a payment withhold post an additional surety bond to secure release of withheld funds while investigations proceed; supporters say it safeguards good providers caught in long investigations, while critics warned of added costs and barriers to small or rural providers. The amendment was placed into the work after committee votes.
An amendment discussed at the joint hearing, A6, would allow a provider facing a payment withhold following a credible allegation of fraud to post an additional surety bond so withheld funds could be released while an investigation continues.
Sponsor Senator Abler described the concept as a way to preserve provider operations and the continuity of services: "It would allow a provider who is subject to a withhold following a credible allegation of fraud to post an additional surety bond... and if they post the surety bond, DHS would release the withheld funds for previously provided services." The staff explanation said the bond value could be the total value of previously withheld funds or a DHS risk‑based calculation.
Supporters argued the bond approach protects providers that may ultimately be found not liable and keeps clients served; Senator Haber said many quality providers have been "snagged up" in investigations and that a bonding mechanism could let them continue to serve.
Opponents and cautious members raised implementation questions: who underwrites the bond, how the bond amount is calculated, whether bond costs would raise provider rates or exclude some organizations from participation, and whether the state would still face delays in recovery if investigations take long periods. Senator Lisky and others warned surety costs would be borne somewhere in the system and might affect rates.
Committee procedure: members on the human services side voted to place the A6 concept into the work; committee staff and sponsors said they would continue working with DHS and other stakeholders to refine the proposal and to address concerns about access and cost.
