Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning, public works and development directors warn vacancies, long permit timelines and M2 obligations would worsen without revenue or staffing
Summary
Community & Economic Development and Public Works directors told the ad hoc committee that staffing shortages and existing maintenance-of-effort (M2) obligations limit options for further cuts and that one-time revenue ideas (claiming unclaimed engineering balances, reissued bonds, internal-service fund draws) could yield limited short-term relief.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senayna Thomas, director of Community & Economic Development, and Public Works Director Steven Baez described how chronic vacancies and reliance on consultants have stretched departmental capacity and impaired permit and code-enforcement turnaround times.
Thomas said plan checks and permit issuance are high (roughly 8,700 per year for the city) and that the department frequently relies on professional-services contracts to augment staff, which can cost two to three times the equivalent in-house cost and lacks institutional continuity. She said a 5% cut would lengthen review timelines, reduce on-time performance and affect revenue realization from development.
Baez said Public Works manages multiple funds, including enterprise and restricted funds, and highlighted the citys maintenance-of-effort (M2) requirement for regional roads funding. He warned that reducing general-fund CIP support would risk losing regional funding and that the department has limited general-fund flexibility.
To meet near-term shortfalls, Baez presented one-time revenue ideas: claiming long-unclaimed private-development engineering account balances (staff estimate ~$700,000 available after noticing), recovering previously unclaimed engineered bonds (staff estimate ~$145,000), and drawing down internal-service fund balances (estimated $101,500). He emphasized that these are one-time remedies and would require council action and noticing processes.
"We're not in a vacuum. If we reduce timeline and staffing, revenue is realized later or not at all," Thomas said, explaining the connection between staff capacity and development-driven revenues.
Both directors and committee members discussed the possibility of structural changes, such as asset transfers or exploring the sale/privatization of the water system, as longer-term revenue options but noted legal and practical constraints and the time required for complex procurement or elections.
