Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Digital Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly panel advances bill asking Instructional Quality Commission to add digital-safety guidance for students
Summary
The Assembly Appropriations Committee advanced AB 1792, which asks the Instructional Quality Commission to consider updating health education guidance to address AI-generated sexualized imagery, digital violence and digital consent; the author called it low-cost and non‑mandating and a TechNet representative testified in support.
Assemblymember Rodriguez asked the California Instructional Quality Commission to consider modernizing health education guidance to help students recognize and respond to online harms, advancing AB 1792 out of the Assembly Appropriations Committee on May 6.
"AI is everywhere," the bill uthor said, arguing that millions of AI-generated sexualized images, including thousands that appear to involve minors, are circulating online and that schools should be equipped to teach students how to protect themselves. The author emphasized the bill "is about preparation, not fear" and described it as a "smart, low-cost investment" that "does not create a new program or mandate." (Assemblymember Rodriguez)
Jose Torres, representing TechNet, testified as a sponsor and urged the committee to ensure the state's health education framework keeps pace with how students interact in digital spaces. "This bill reflects that reality by ensuring that California's health education framework remains current and responsive," Torres said, recommending age-appropriate guidance on digital safety, digital violence and digital consent.
The bill would direct the Instructional Quality Commission to consider incorporating such guidance into future updates of the health education framework; proponents said the approach is flexible, allowing educators and experts to adapt materials as technology evolves. Both the author and sponsor characterized the change as guidance rather than a new mandate or program, saying any costs would be "minor and absorbable."
Committee members moved and seconded the measure; Chair announced the motion to "do pass." The chair noted the item was advanced "out" with Republicans not voting, per the committee roll call procedure.
What happens next: AB 1792 will be returned to committee for final steps as it moves through the Legislature; the Instructional Quality Commission would be the entity instructed to consider the guidance if the bill becomes law.
