Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislative Administration sends ethics bill (SB 570) to interim study, places it on consent
Summary
The committee voted unanimously to send Senate Bill 570—a set of targeted ethics changes—from immediate action to an interim study, citing inconsistent definitions and missing language (such as the word “substantial”) that members said could broaden recusal triggers.
The Legislative Administration committee voted unanimously to send Senate Bill 570 to interim study and placed the measure on the consent calendar.
Chair opened the executive session on SB 570 and recognized Representative Sheehan, who moved that the bill be referred for interim study. After discussion focused on definition and drafting concerns, the clerk conducted a roll call; the chair announced the motion passed 12–0.
Members said the Senate’s version includes a mix of edits—some useful tweaks but not a comprehensive restructuring—and highlighted inconsistent terminology. The chair told the committee, “It needs much more work than changing the definitions of 1 or 2 things,” arguing the bill omitted the word “substantial” in a key place and that omission could broaden the standard for conflicts of interest.
Representative Wahl urged a broader look at social‑media implications for ethics rules, saying recent national developments made an in‑depth New Hampshire review timely. Representative Waite and others said language about direct financial benefit and third‑party influence would benefit from clearer, stricter drafting.
The committee’s interim study will allow staff and members to review definitions and potential additions—such as social‑media guidance—over the summer before returning a recommendation to the full House. The chair closed the SB 570 portion of the meeting and moved on to other business.
