Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs bamboo control and deer‑repellent complaints; directs staff to research Fairfax County approach
Summary
Council heard that running bamboo is difficult and costly to eradicate, that the town owns multiple bamboo stands and that Fairfax County adopted a bamboo containment ordinance effective Jan. 2023; council asked staff to inventory town bamboo, review Fairfax enforcement experience and return with recommendations. Separately, residents' complaints about ultrasonic deer‑repellent devices prompted staff advice to attempt owner outreach and adjustments before regulatory fixes.
Councilmembers discussed invasive plant species and resident complaints about ultrasonic deer‑repellent devices during the Jan. 13 Vienna work session.
Jeremy Edwards, park maintenance superintendent, explained why some non‑native plants become invasive and said the town has pockets of running bamboo that are difficult to remove because of deep rhizomes and regrowth. "It takes multiple years, sometimes five and ten years even to get effective control on bamboo," he said, outlining mechanical and herbicide approaches and noting tradeoffs when bamboo intermingles with tree roots.
The town attorney summarized Fairfax County’s approach: the county adopted a bamboo ordinance effective January 2023 requiring property owners to contain running bamboo that spreads to public rights‑of‑way or adjoining properties, provides an appeal process and authorizes civil penalties (Fairfax set a cap of $2,000 in a 12‑month period). Council members voiced equity concerns: remediation costs can be high, and some homeowners may inherit bamboo they did not plant. Several members urged the town to clean and control bamboo on town‑owned land before pursuing enforcement actions against residents.
Staff reported current work includes volunteer invasive‑plant removal programs and that staff lack capacity and contractor funding to tackle all town sites. Council directed staff (Leslie and parks/public works) to compile an updated inventory, provide ballpark remediation costs, study Fairfax County’s enforcement experience and return with an informational memo; council did not endorse a specific new town ordinance at the meeting.
On deer‑repellent devices, the council reviewed resident complaints that ultrasonic sensors emit high‑frequency sounds some people can hear and found no clear code path for direct prohibition. The police chief demonstrated a commercially sold device and noted it is adjustable; councilmembers suggested outreach to users to lower settings as a first step, and requested public education on deer management alongside an ordinance review scheduled for a February work session.
