Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Coweta council approves rezoning of 1.07-acre parcel near 301st Street East

Coweta City Council · April 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Coweta City Council on April 6 adopted Ordinance 914 (CZ 26-01), rezoning a 1.07-acre property from Agriculture (AG) to Residential Single Family (RS-3); the property owner was not present at the March Planning Commission meeting, and the vote was unanimous.

The Coweta City Council on April 6 adopted Ordinance 914 (CZ 26-01), approving the rezoning of approximately 1.07 acres from Agriculture (AG) to Residential Single Family (RS-3). The action followed a brief staff presentation and a short public hearing that closed without testimony from the property owner.

Community Director Jessica Zwirtz presented the council with the rezoning request submitted by property owner Jessica Morris and reviewed the legal description of the parcel located on 301st Street East at 141st Street. Council opened the required public hearing at 6:17 p.m., confirmed the property owner had not attended the March 16 Planning Commission meeting, and closed the hearing at 6:18 p.m.

Mayor Naomi Hogue moved to adopt Ordinance 914 (CZ 26-01); Councilmember Jeremy Barnett seconded the motion. The ordinance passed on a unanimous voice vote of the five-member council. No conditions beyond those in the ordinance were recorded in the minutes.

Why it matters: rezoning from AG to RS-3 changes the permitted use of the parcel from agricultural to residential single-family standards, which may allow future subdivision or home construction consistent with RS-3 zoning. The minutes do not specify a planned developer, subdivision name, or an effective date for the ordinance.

The council did not record any public opposition in the minutes, and no appeal or further procedural steps were noted in the meeting record. The ordinance was entered into the minutes as adopted; any effective date or administrative follow-up was not specified.