Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildland Urban Interface topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ivins council delays adopting state wildfire map, orders public work session
Summary
After a lengthy discussion about competing wildfire risk maps and potential homeowner impacts, the Ivins City Council voted to delay adopting a state Wildland‑Urban Interface map and requested a work session with state map authors and staff to answer resident questions.
The Ivins City Council spent more than an hour debating whether to adopt the state’s wildland‑urban interface (WUI) map and how to reconcile it with a city‑drawn map that would determine which properties face stricter building standards.
Chief Kavir, the city’s fire chief, told the council that the 2006 WUI code requires a municipality to declare interface areas and that the state has produced a new map showing the “high risk” areas across Utah. He said the county will use the state map to notify residents about inspections, and that the city’s decision about what map to adopt affects new construction standards locally.
“The 2006 code requires us to adopt a map,” Chief Kavir said, arguing the city must decide what parts of Ivins to classify as the wildland‑urban interface so builders know whether to apply fire‑rated construction standards.
Chuck Gillette, the city manager, presented a city‑prepared map intended to limit the footprint of the WUI boundary for local construction rules. Gillette said the city map focuses enforcement on the interface between wildland and the urban core and would exclude many of the neighborhoods the state map marks as high risk.
Council members raised two core concerns: whether adopting a larger map would increase construction costs (by requiring rated roofs, walls or other upgrades on new homes) and whether inclusion on the state map would influence insurers to raise or cancel policies for existing homeowners. Councilmember Mike Scott called for clear communications to residents and simpler explanations of what the maps mean for insurance and construction costs.
“From a resident perspective, they want to know three things: what do I need to do to make my home safer, will I be able to buy or keep insurance, and can I afford it?” Scott said.
Council directed staff to arrange a work meeting that would include state map authors and representatives from the Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL) so residents can ask technical questions directly. The council also asked for a small sub‑group of council members and staff to meet with the city manager to prepare focused questions before that public session.
The city did not vote to adopt any map. Instead, council members agreed to gather more information, bring experts to a public forum and refine the proposed boundary and ordinance language so residents and builders have clearer guidance about inspections, insurance implications and construction standards.
