Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Culverts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Atchison County authorizes $3,094 contribution to upgrade low-water crossing; landowners to cover larger-pipe cost

Atchison County Commission · May 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Atchison County Commission authorized a $3,094 county contribution toward installing a 60-inch culvert at a low-water crossing (Bridge C2-4) and approved a plan for township/landowners to order and pay any difference to upgrade to a faster-delivery 84-inch pipe; the motion passed 3-0.

Atchison County commissioners on May 5 authorized the county to pay $3,094 toward installing a 60-inch galvanized culvert at Bridge C2-4 to raise the crossing from a 2-year to a 7-year storm capacity, allowing staff to install the new pipe next to the existing 84-inch outlet.

Emily, Road and Bridge staff, told the board that the engineer recommended adding a 60-inch pipe to give the crossing protection for a seven-year storm, explaining: “So a 60 inch would be sufficient enough to give it 7 years.” Commissioners and township representatives discussed options to instead use a larger 84-inch, 12‑gauge pipe that vendors could deliver faster but at higher cost.

Township representative Lee Oswald said a private vendor could produce an 84-inch pipe with short lead time: “When you call them, they make them the next day,” and urged the board to consider landowners’ preference for quicker delivery. Road and Bridge identified material estimates of $3,094 for a new 60-inch galvanized culvert and $4,282.50 for an 84-inch pipe (not including delivery); delivery and gauge choices will affect final cost.

After commissioners discussed logistics — including who would order the pipe, how delivery would be handled and whether a written agreement was needed to protect county and private interests — a commissioner moved to authorize the county’s portion. The motion directed the county to pay $3,094 plus the county’s delivery cost to the township, and it authorized the township to order the pipe and, if landowners choose a larger or different-gauge pipe, to pay the difference and be reimbursed by the county for the $3,094 portion. The board instructed staff to prepare a short written letter agreement outlining responsibilities.

The motion carried on a 3-0 vote. The board and township also discussed a practical schedule; Road and Bridge said it could likely start installation within about two weeks depending on workload and weather, but staff emphasized that scheduling depends on other high-priority flood repairs.

The board’s action covers the county’s material contribution and reimbursement process; any upgraded pipe size, higher gauge or expedited delivery beyond the $3,094 material amount will be handled and funded by the township or landowners and confirmed in the written agreement.