Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Conditional Use Permit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Raynor committee approves $100 supplemental fee for conditional use permit amendment for local college

City of Raynor Personnel Finance Committee · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Raynor Personnel Finance Committee voted by voice to approve staff’s request to reduce supplemental warrant fees to $100 for a recently filed conditional use permit amendment for a college, citing a miscommunication about parking capacity; the applicant had paid the original $500 fee that funded the initial findings.

The City of Raynor Personnel Finance Committee approved a staff recommendation to reduce supplemental warrant fees to $100 for a conditional use permit (CUP) amendment related to a college identified in the transcript as "Central Minnesota Dermot College." Committee Chair Dave Johnson called the single-item meeting and the committee voted by voice after a brief explanation from staff.

Community Development Director James Cromer told the committee the CUP amendment was filed immediately after the original CUP approval because of a miscommunication over how much parking the original permit would allow. Cromer said staff reviewed the amendment quickly — "it did take staff only about 10 to 15 minutes to make some of the edits because the parking went from, I think, 65 to 90" — and that the applicant had already paid the original $500, which covered the work to make the initial findings. For the additional legal and mailing costs associated with the amendment, staff recommended reducing the additional warrant fees to $100.

Cromer moved to approve the reduction; a second was recorded but not attributed to a named member in the transcript. Chair Dave Johnson asked if there was any discussion; after members indicated support — "Makes sense to me" — Johnson called for a voice vote. The committee answered "Aye," and the chair recorded the motion as approved by voice vote. The transcript does not include a roll-call vote or a numerical tally.

The committee adjourned after the vote. The transcript records the college name and several attendee names as spoken during introductions; some names and terms appear to be transcribed imperfectly and are reported here as they appear in the record.