Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommends City Council approve Steel Ridge specific‑plan amendment; staff says existing EIR remains adequate
Summary
The Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve a specific‑plan amendment and tentative subdivision map for the Steel Ridge property in the Sun Creek area, changing roughly 27.8 acres of lower‑density designations to medium‑density while keeping total dwelling units at 950; staff and commenters discussed EIR age and ongoing agency permits.
The Rancho Cordova Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve a specific‑plan amendment for the Steel Ridge (Stillridge) property in the Sun Creek planning area and to adopt resolutions approving related large‑lot and small‑lot tentative parcel map amendments.
Senior environmental planner Lindsay Morrow told commissioners the applicant is proposing to revise some land‑use designations — changing about 16 acres of low‑density residential and about 11.8 acres of compact medium‑density residential to medium‑density residential — and to modify large‑lot and small‑lot maps to facilitate phasing and property transfers. Morrow said the amendment would not change the total approved dwelling‑unit count of 950 units, of which 810 are single‑family lots.
"The amendment would change 16 acres of low density residential and 11.8 acres of compact medium density residential to medium density residential," Morrow said, adding that the Sun Creek specific plan and its certified EIR (approved previously) analyzed the project area and that, in staff’s view, the amendment is consistent with the prior EIR and does not require a new environmental impact report.
Morrow noted that the Sun Creek EIR and associated mitigation monitoring and reporting program remain in effect, and she listed active permits and biological approvals that apply to the planning area, including a 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biological opinion, an Army Corps Section 404 permit and a State Water Board Section 401 water‑quality certification. She said the applicant must complete habitat conservation‑plan (HCP) permits and updated biological surveys as part of future entitlement phases.
Ellen Land, a nearby resident, urged stricter environmental review and questioned reliance on a 2013 EIR: "The 2013 EIR seems sort of old to us," she said, citing concerns about changes in water sourcing, air quality, traffic, dust and wildlife impacts along adjacent wetland preserves.
Commissioners asked staff how EIR baselines are set and whether new environmental analysis would be required. Morrow explained that CEQA baseline conditions are established at the time of a notice of preparation and that a new EIR is required only if proposed changes are substantial or would reveal new or more severe impacts than previously disclosed. She added that air quality and mitigation are also revisited at subsequent grading and infrastructure entitlement stages.
After discussion and a motion to adopt staff recommendations (to find no further CEQA analysis necessary, waive first reading and introduce an ordinance for the specific‑plan amendment and adopt resolutions for the tentative map amendments), the commission approved a recommendation to City Council by roll call. The commission also noted that additional permitting and agency coordination (biological surveys, HCP permit processing, Army Corps and water‑quality approvals) will continue as the project moves forward.
The commission’s vote sends the specific‑plan amendment and tentative maps to the City Council for final action; staff indicated further, project‑level environmental and mitigation steps will be handled during subsequent development entitlements and permit reviews.
