Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Anson commissioners unanimously adopt flex‑time ordinance change, excluding remote work; county attorney outlines process

Anson County Board of Commissioners · May 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board voted unanimously to adopt a change allowing department heads to set flexible schedules for county employees (remote work excluded). County Attorney Scott Forbes advised on statutory notice and reading requirements and recommended advertising if the vote had not been unanimous.

Anson County commissioners voted unanimously to adopt a change to the county personnel ordinance allowing department heads to set flexible work schedules for employees, while explicitly excluding remote work.

County Attorney Scott Forbes told the board that amending a North Carolina personnel ordinance requires public notice and a public meeting; two readings are an option but not required if a unanimous vote is obtained. "My recommendation is advertise it, have a reading, and a vote," Forbes said, adding his initial caution was offered to reduce the risk of legal challenge. He also advised that, if the first vote is not unanimous, the board should advertise and take a second vote after the required notice period.

Commissioner Gatewood moved to adopt the flex‑time language developed by department directors; a fellow commissioner seconded the motion. The board voted in favor by voice and the chair declared the motion passed unanimously. The chair and county attorney confirmed the change takes effect immediately and that remote work is excluded from the ordinance change.

Separately, the board reviewed an agenda addition to create an Assistant Director of EMS Operations position (classification 71) with a salary range listed in the job materials at $54,017 to $93,694. Commissioners asked for additional time to study the job description and budget impact. The board agreed to defer formal consideration until the May 19 meeting when the EMS director will be present to answer questions.

For transparency, Forbes reiterated that if any future ordinance vote is not unanimous the board should follow the advertising timeline and conduct a second reading; tonight's unanimous vote obviated that additional step.

The board took no legal or administrative action beyond adopting the flex‑time change and scheduling follow‑up for the EMS position.