Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yolo County staff present $13.7M in viable budget cuts; board seeks more analysis and delays final decisions
Summary
The county's chief financial officer told supervisors staff identified $13.7 million in technically and legally viable reduction options for FY 2026'27, but a total gap (after HHSA non-general-fund shortfalls and legal-defense costs) remains. The board asked staff to engage nonprofit partners, analyze overtime vs. FTE trade-offs, and continue budget deliberations on May 5 and at the June recommended-budget hearing.
Yolo County's finance team on April 28 presented supervisors with a preliminary plan to address a structural deficit in the county general fund and a related shortfall in Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) non-general-fund sources.
Tom Haines, the county chief financial officer, told the Board that departments submitted about $20.9 million in proposed reduction options after a board direction in January. Staff filtered those proposals and identified roughly $13.7 million in reductions that are technically and legally viable for the 2026'27 recommended budget; another $7.1 million in suggested options needs additional analysis before being considered. Haines added that HHSA faces approximately $11.7 million in non-general-fund structural shortfalls that could require general-fund backfill if not addressed.
"A structural budget deficit is defined by a situation where our ongoing expenditures consistently exceed and are outpacing our ongoing revenues," Haines said. He presented a scenario that included modest revenue assumptions, use of reserves and one-time funds, and the $13.7 million in recommended reductions; even with those steps, staff estimated a remaining gap of about $1 million for the recommended budget and a longer-term structural challenge.
Supervisors probed specific line items on the reductions list and requested additional analysis: several trustees asked staff to engage community-based organizations (CBOs) affected by contract reductions (for example, crisis-nursery, volunteer income tax assistance, and food-bank distributions) to explore phased reductions or short-term "runways" rather than immediate elimination; they also asked for a closer look at the library archives cut under consideration after multiple public speakers urged the position be preserved. The Board directed staff to return with deeper detail and to continue the discussion at a scheduled May 5 continuation, with the recommended budget hearing set for June 9.
Board members also flagged program-level questions that need policy discussion, especially in child-welfare services where overtime and placement costs are high. Supervisors asked staff to analyze whether some overtime use could be reduced by creating permanent FTEs in programs where that would be cost-effective over time, and to provide program-by-program cost-benefit analyses where feasible.
Public commenters urged preserving small nonprofit contracts and archives staffing. Representatives of the Yolo Food Bank asked the Board to maintain a modest $85,000 line for volunteer-distribution supplies that enables large-scale food distribution to county residents; archive users described digitization work and volunteer multipliers that would be harmed if staffing were reduced.
Why it matters: The county faces a multi-year structural deficit. The Board must weigh program impacts against the need for durable, structural fiscal solutions; many proposed reductions would slow or eliminate services and would affect vulnerable residents and nonprofit partners.
What's next: Staff will follow up with CBOs and affected departments, provide additional analysis on child-welfare workforce and overtime trade-offs, consider whether some options in Attachment A can be converted into viable near-term reductions, and return for continued discussion on May 5 and with the recommended budget in June.
