Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge city action on drinking-water contaminants and a street-sweeper oil leak in public comment
Summary
Public commenters raised environmental concerns: a resident cited research on perchlorate and older PFAS compounds and asked the council to monitor drinking-water limits; another resident reported a street sweeper leaking oil across a neighborhood and staff said they would follow up with Atlas Disposal, the contractor.
Get email alerts on the Environment Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two public-comment speakers told the Rancho Cordova City Council they want city attention on separate local environmental and neighborhood-maintenance issues.
Larry Ladd, speaking as a registered representative for Joe Lisonbee, urged the council to follow developments on perchlorate and PFAS in drinking water. He said Californias local limits and federal recommendations differ and cited a scientific article (PubMed ID 3790275) he said links older PFAS compounds to cancer risk in certain populations. "Down the road, the community at large is going to have to decide how much perchlorate they want in their drinking water," Ladd said, asking the council to keep the issue on its radar and offering to share citations.
Resident Chris Flatt reported that in October or November a city-contracted street sweeper leaked oil along its route in his neighborhood, leaving a trail that he said could wash into storm drains. He said he had contacted Atlas Disposal, the contractor he understands is responsible for sweeping, and felt the response had been insufficient. City staff said Atlas is a contractor under a city contract and that staff would contact the appropriate operations supervisor (Albert) to follow up and provide a contact for the resident.
Nut graf: The comments reflect two distinct community concerns: long-term contamination questions about perchlorate/PFAS that may require monitoring and interagency science review, and an operational street-maintenance problem — a possible oil release from a contracted sweeper — that city staff said they would investigate with the contractor.
Council members and staff thanked the speakers and directed staff to follow up on the street-sweeper complaint; there was no recorded formal action on the water-quality claims that evening.
