Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pilot finds vape detectors can reduce bathroom vaping where used; board to refine pilot before wide purchase

Washington County Public Schools Board of Education · May 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A year‑long pilot of bathroom vape detectors at two high schools produced mixed results but reported roughly a 75% reduction in detections after audible alerts in tested locations; staff recommended further piloting and procedural work before a systemwide rollout, noting an estimated full‑system cost and available restricted funds.

Washington County Public Schools staff and school principals reviewed a pilot program that installed vape detectors in selected high‑school bathrooms and tested silent and audible alert modes.

Safety and security staff said the pilot setup cost roughly $9,500 per school and that early silent alerts produced many notifications, including many that resolved to empty bathrooms. When the district switched to audible alarms at one site, staff measured a reduction of about 75% in detections at the instrumented locations, a change principals described as reducing opportunistic vaping in those bathrooms.

“We saw about a 75% reduction in vape detection because the alarm goes off,” a principal said of an audible‑alarm phase. Another principal said early activation counts were low at first (about 13 recorded hits) but that firmware changes and configuration adjustments later increased detection sensitivity.

Staff and principals emphasized operational challenges: a 60–90 second atmospheric detection delay sometimes meant staff arrived to find bathrooms empty; the detectors can trigger on high occupancy or masking aerosols; and the devices require site‑specific placement and HVAC considerations. Principals described the importance of careful standard operating procedures to avoid falsely accusing students and noted that surveillance footage and hall‑pass systems could help triangulate who entered a restroom during an alert.

Staff provided a systemwide estimate for high‑school restrooms and locker rooms of roughly $555,000 in initial device and installation costs (at approximately $1,800 per device) plus ongoing annual support of about $145 per device. The board was told there is approximately $448,000 in a restricted settlement fund that could cover much of a first‑phase investment. Board members asked staff to extend and refine the pilot (for example, instrumenting every restroom in one school or adding a middle school), to develop legal and discipline protocols and to pursue education and parent engagement as complementary strategies.

Next steps: staff recommended continuing to refine the pilot, work with legal counsel on response protocols, partner with health and community providers on education, and report back before any large‑scale purchase.