Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Records Software topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plumas County to study public‑records portal after staff review of vendors

Plumas County Board of Supervisors · April 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff reviewed four public‑records software vendors and the board directed county counsel and clerk to return in fall with recommendations and a timeline to allow overlap with the current contract; Logical will remain in place through June 30, 2027.

Plumas County staff outlined options Thursday for replacing the county's public‑records management software and the Board of Supervisors directed staff to return by October or November with recommendations and a transition timeline.

Why it matters: The county currently uses Logical for PRA processing and discovery but staff told the board it lacks a public‑facing portal. NextRequest (part of CivicPlus), JustFOIA and a Tyler Technologies FOIA offering were evaluated; costs quoted ranged from about $7,000 up to six figures, depending on package and setup. A public portal could let residents search previously responded requests, reduce duplicate requests and save staff time, staff and board members said.

"NextRequest looks like a huge improvement," said one supervisor during the discussion, praising its public‑portal, deduplication and redaction tools. County staff said NextRequest’s packages ranged from roughly $11,000 to $19,000 plus setup, while JustFOIA estimated $7,000–$15,000; Tyler officials indicated substantially higher pricing.

County counsel noted Logical provides bulk redaction and discovery tools used for large PRA responses and has supported legal discovery needs; assistant county counsel Sarah James said that Logical had been selected partly for its discovery benefits. "Logical has a lot of good things behind the scenes," James said, but she added that NextRequest can keep records in a private back end until staff choose to publish them.

Board direction: Rather than change vendors immediately, the board voted to direct county counsel and the deputy clerk to return with options and a recommended timeline for transition that would allow overlap and training so the county would not face a service gap. The current Logical contract runs through June 30, 2027, staff said.

What’s next: Staff will report back with cost comparisons, estimated staff‑hour savings, termination penalties (if any), and onboarding steps so the board can decide whether to keep Logical or switch to a public‑facing option and, if so, when to begin implementation.