Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies temporary disruption of municipal parking easement for Broad Street redevelopment
Summary
A request to temporarily disrupt a municipal easement for seven parking spaces during construction at 40 Broad Street drew competing testimony from the applicant and downtown business owners; the Board voted 10-5 to deny the temporary accommodation.
The Board considered a planning-and-zoning referral asking permission for a temporary disruption of a municipal easement that currently supports seven parking spaces behind a downtown parcel at 40 Broad Street.
Attorney Thomas Lynch, representing property owner Stu Walls, described plans to tear down the existing building and erect a new zoning-compliant mixed-use structure (retail on the ground floor and 10 apartments above). He said the construction would temporarily occupy the easement area but that the seven spaces would be returned and covered under the new building; leases would prohibit residential tenants from using the onsite spaces.
Several aldermen and nearby business owners expressed concern about how contractors and future tenants would be prevented from using the municipal spaces and how short-term disruption would affect parking availability for downtown customers. "We have to balance how one person's project will affect the entire city," Alderman Pacelli said, noting calls from neighboring businesses worried about lot impact.
The Board took a roll-call vote and the motion failed, 10 no to 5 yes.
What this means: The denial leaves the municipal easement intact and imposes no temporary release for construction. The applicant may revisit site planning or return with a modified plan that mitigates impacts on public parking.
