Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates whether special‑use permits can carry time limits; staff and counsel outline options
Summary
Commissioners discussed a canceled case and whether the zoning code allows time bounds on special‑use permits; staff said current ordinance does not permit a time limit but recommended either adding a one‑year start condition when granting permits or formally amending the ordinance to allow explicit time limits.
At the May 4 meeting, the Cascade Charter Township Planning Commission discussed whether special‑use permits can be granted with a time limit after Chair raised a canceled case (253903) and asked for direction.
Kevin Garcia, the interim planner with McKenna, told the commission that the current zoning ordinance does not provide the authority to place time limits on special‑use permits. "The current zoning ordinance does not allow a time limit to be placed on a special use permit," Garcia said, adding that staff found a 2022 letter that did include a time limit but that staff later stopped including such language because the ordinance did not clearly authorize it.
Mallory Reeder of Foster Swift, appearing as counsel, told the commission that while the ordinance lacks an explicit time‑limit provision for special‑use permits, the board could either adopt a condition requiring permit holders to begin construction or use within a year or pursue an ordinance amendment to add that authority. "If you wanted to say…you've gotta start construction or start using the approved use within a year, that's definitely something that could be a condition or an amendment to the zoning ordinance," Reeder said.
Commissioners said they wanted township attorneys to review options and noted the draft new zoning ordinance does include time‑limit provisions for some approvals. The chair directed staff to check with township attorneys and to ensure permit files reflect any start‑within‑12‑months condition when used.
No ordinance amendment was adopted at the meeting; commissioners instead included a start‑within‑12‑months condition in the approval for case 26‑3915 and asked staff to follow up with legal counsel on possible ordinance changes.
