Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Landscape Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission refines landscaping rules, forwards ordinance to town council

Fairfield Planning and Zoning · May 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Fairfield planning commissioners completed a line‑by‑line review of a draft landscaping ordinance, agreed to clarify developer vs. homeowner standards and non‑retroactivity, and voted to forward the amended Title 10.19 landscaping ordinance to the town council for review.

Fairfield Planning and Zoning commissioners finished a public hearing and voted to send an amended landscaping ordinance to the town council for review and potential adoption.

The commission, led by the chair, opened the public hearing on the ordinance and found no public comment before proceeding to a detailed, page‑by‑page review. Commissioner Jamie moved to forward the ordinance to council after commissioners resolved several drafting issues; the motion carried.

Commissioners focused on clarifying how the ordinance treats developer‑installed landscaping versus individual single‑family yards. Brad, a reviewer working with the draft, said the goal was to require developers who install landscaping for a subdivision to meet stronger standards while avoiding retroactive burdens on existing homeowners. "This is a very, I would say, very specific, landscaping ordinance," Brad said, noting minimum tree caliper and evergreen height requirements can raise costs but improve survivability.

To address resident concerns about retroactivity, commissioners agreed to add explicit effective‑date language making the ordinance prospective: new requirements would apply only to development applications submitted after adoption. Chair asked staff to add a non‑retroactivity sentence in the ordinance’s purpose or effective‑date section so existing yards would be grandfathered unless they undergo a change of use or subdivision.

The commission also resolved several drafting edits: replacing references to an "air park" nonresidential zone with "mixed use zones," removing multifamily mentions where those zones do not yet exist, and confirming minimum parking‑lot landscaping requirements (a minimum 5% of total parking lot area and one tree per 10 parking spaces). On fencing, commissioners agreed to permit chain‑link when used as a screening device if slatted to roughly 85% closure, preferring a positive, performance‑based rule rather than an outright prohibition.

After finishing the edits and agreeing Brad would polish outstanding wording before the ordinance goes to council, Commissioner Jamie moved and the commission approved forwarding Title 10.19.00 (landscaping requirements) to the town council for review and approval. The commission also agreed that Brad would continue to review the ordinance language and that staff would add effective date/non‑retroactivity language.

The commission voted unanimously on the forwarding motion. The town council will receive the ordinance for its review and any further public hearings or decisions.

The commission adjourned at approximately 8:12 p.m.