Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appellant says individual wage‑liability judgment should be vacated, citing venue and missing jury predicate
Summary
In Zunik v. Cogenesis LLC, appellant Adjir Reddy argued the trial judgment imposing individual liability should be vacated because Massachusetts lacked the most significant relationship under conflict‑of‑laws rules and because the verdict form omitted the statutory §148 predicate (management of wage payment), a structural defect Appellee urged preservation and contractual choice‑of‑law defenses.
May it please the court: Adjir Reddy, appearing pro se by video, asked the three‑justice panel to vacate the judgment that held him personally liable for unpaid wages stemming from his company, Cogenesis LLC. Reddy told the court he was not the functional manager of payroll and emphasized two primary grounds for relief: that Massachusetts did not have the "most significant relationship" to the employment for purposes of the wage statute under Taylor and G. L. c. 149 §1, and that the jury was never asked the §148 statutory predicate (whether Reddy "had the management of…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
