Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Saint Pauls Church seeks $82,000 from Newburyport for parish hall roof

Newburyport City Community Preservation Committee · February 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Saint Pauls Church requested an $82,000 Newburyport community preservation grant to repair its century-old parish hall roof, arguing the hall serves hundreds weekly and that slate would best preserve downtown character despite higher contractor bids.

Saint Pauls Church asked the Newburyport Community Preservation Committee for an $82,000 grant to replace the parish hall roof and preserve a building the presenter said has anchored the city for more than 100 years.

"We've always been a community resource," Stuart Tuthill, who identified himself as representing Saint Pauls Church, told the committee. He said the church hosts meals, twelve-step meetings and other community services that bring about 900 to 1,000 people through the campus each week.

Tuthill said the parish hall roof is more than a century old and showed committee members photographs of missing and fractured slate. He presented two contractor bids: one from a slate roofer recommended by a local firm at about $185,000 and a lower bid near $110,000 from a synthetic-roof product contractor. He told the committee that while the synthetic product (DaVinci) carries a 30-year guarantee and would be less expensive, slate can last 100 years and better preserves the historic streetscape.

Committee members pressed on durability and preservation conditions. A committee member noted Saint Pauls would need a perpetual preservation restriction on the parish hall, and Tuthill said the chapel next door already has such a restriction and the church would accept similar protections for the hall.

The committee did not vote on the grant request; members asked clarifying procurement information and said they would consider the application during deliberations scheduled for March 19.

The committee requested a breakdown of the most recent January proposal (line items for structural versus cosmetic work) before final deliberations.