Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fairgrounds Nhra topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County resumes talks with Gainesville Raceway on relocating fairgrounds but rules out paying to extend city water
Summary
Staff told commissioners they will continue negotiations with Gainesville Raceway (NHRA) only if the board declines to pay an estimated $3 million to extend potable GRU water to the site; staff also recommended seeking fee‑simple acquisition of 12 acres with ongoing access to parking, while zoning and operations remain to be negotiated.
Get email alerts on the Fairgrounds Nhra topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alachua County staff briefed the board on ongoing negotiations with Gainesville Raceway/AutoPlus Raceway and the National Hot Rod Association about relocating the county fairgrounds. The county manager told commissioners two issues are especially problematic: Raceway corporate has withdrawn a prior willingness to operate the fairgrounds, and staff estimates extending GRU potable water a mile to the site would cost roughly $3 million — a sum that erodes the site''s principal budget advantage.
Manager Richard Drummond asked commissioners to confirm direction: staff should continue negotiations only if the board will not fund the waterline extension, will seek fee‑simple conveyance or a long‑term lease to secure ~12 acres dedicated to buildings plus permanent easements for parking and event access, will process necessary zoning and land‑development approvals, and will seek an operator or operational arrangement separate from Raceway if Raceway chooses not to operate the facility. The manager also said the county could consider alternatives such as on‑site well, treatment and storage but asked staff to obtain cost estimates for those options for comparison.
Many commissioners said the site''s existing infrastructure and opportunities (including potential for larger venues) remain attractive despite the waterline cost, and asked staff to return with more detailed cost estimates, legal analyses and recommended terms, including how any transfer or lease would handle future maintenance costs and possible reverter clauses. The board voted unanimously to continue negotiations with those conditions and to ask staff to return with cost and feasibility information.
