Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff report strains from Minnesota Paid Leave; board grants temporary-hire authority
Summary
Isanti County HR staff reported 22 local paid-leave applications (10 approved, 1 denied, 7 in review) and urged flexibility to fill long-term vacancies; the board approved personnel-committee notes authorizing the county administrator and HR to jointly hire temporary staff under limits to avoid PERA and union implications.
Get email alerts on the Employment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Isanti County commissioners on Thursday heard a detailed update on Minnesota Paid Leave and approved personnel-committee recommendations to give county leaders discretion to fill long-term vacancies with temporary hires.
Heather, a county staff member presenting the briefing, said Minnesota’s program is funded by a 0.88% payroll premium (generally split between employer and employee) and offers up to 20 combined weeks of family and medical leave. "We have 22 applications submitted [in Isanti County]. We have 10 approved, 1 denied and we have currently 7 in review," Heather said, citing county-level figures through mid-March.
Heather told commissioners several departments are already feeling strain: law, auditor, highway and sheriff offices each have employees on or potentially taking extended leaves; Health & Human Services has multiple staff out in one unit, which increases overtime and coverage pressure. She said some employees top off state benefits using paid time off while others do not, producing mixed payroll impacts; Heather estimated the county’s average weekly benefit was about $1,145.
To address potential service gaps, the personnel committee proposed and the board adopted measures giving the county administrator and HR joint discretion to hire temporary employees for long-term vacancies. Temporary hires will be limited to 67 days (to avoid PERA coverage and union triggers) and staffing decisions will be evaluated for budget neutrality and operational need, Heather said. The committee also discussed using trained temporary social-service vendors for specialized positions that require knowledge and quick onboarding.
Commissioners asked about implementation costs and recruitment; staff said some payroll savings occur because the state covers a portion of wages, but overtime and extra-duty pay offset those savings in units with many leaves. The board approved the personnel committee notes and the discretionary authority on a unanimous roll call.
Next steps: staff will monitor departmental impacts, explore temporary-staff options where appropriate and return with specifics as needs arise.
