Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
La Habra Heights workshop flags sharp cost rises in roads program; council weighs assessment hikes and prioritization
Summary
At a public workshop, La Habra Heights staff and the roads advisory committee presented data showing construction and material costs have risen sharply (asphalt cited rising from about $84/ton to roughly $142/ton), leaving Benefit Assessment District 7 underperforming and the city's general fund covering roughly $1.6 million in shortfalls to date. Council members urged a public capstone workshop and options including indexing assessments or spreading scope to reduce unit costs.
City officials, the roads advisory committee and residents met in La Habra Heights for a workshop that reviewed a decade of street-repair data and the finances behind Benefit Assessment District 7, the property-tax assessment set up in 2016 to fund street repairs.
The presentation, led by roads committee members and city staff, showed project awards and actual construction costs from 2017'18 through the 23'25 cycle and attributed steep increases to higher asphalt prices, elevated mobilization/traffic-control costs, prevailing-wage requirements and rising inspection and design expenses. Staff said asphalt unit costs rose from roughly $80'$85 per ton in earlier projects to about $142 per ton on the most recent project, a change that substantially raised construction totals.
"We can't control escalating costs and we can't continue to take money out of the general fund," one council member said during the workshop, summarizing the presenters' conclusion that the assessment needs a built-in cost accelerator if it is to avoid becoming "a leech on the general fund." Staff noted earlier projects were sized to deliver about $900,000 of work annually, but recent projects have reached $1.3'$1.7 million after bid results and scope changes.
Public commenter Stephen Blackman urged finishing the remaining projects before the assessment district expires, told the group about a blocked drainage inlet on Skyline/Hienda that should be cleared from the public right-of-way, and recommended using tablet/GIS field marking and lower-cost treatments (slurry sealing where feasible) to control design and inspection costs.
Finance staff provided a summary of general-fund supplements for street projects in recent cycles, including two examples approaching or exceeding several hundred thousand dollars per project and an aggregate supplement figure presented to the workshop of roughly $1.6 million paid from the general fund to date to cover shortfalls not funded by District 7 levies or restricted funds.
Presenters described the three principal cost components for projects: grinding (machine removal of existing pavement), asphalt (priced per ton), and slurry/coating treatments. They also explained construction management and inspection add soft costs—daily inspection, mix testing, prevailing-wage compliance and auditing—that increase overall project expenses.
Council and staff discussed options to make the program sustainable: reindexing the assessment to track a cost proxy such as asphalt pricing or a fixed multiplier; increasing the assessment to a level that would support maintenance—staff mentioned a maintenance target on the order of $1 million a year once PCI 75 is achieved; combining projects into larger bids to lower unit pricing; scaling the scope of individual projects to stay near historical yearly budgets; or pursuing state and private grants to offset general-fund draws. Several council members emphasized public engagement before asking voters to approve any increase.
Safety and prioritization also featured in the discussion. Council members and residents urged focusing limited resources on evacuation routes and other safety-critical corridors, noting that a PCI (Pavement Condition Index) of about 75 is the threshold at which the city could shift from expensive grind/overlay repairs to less costly maintenance treatments such as slurry and crack sealing.
Staff outlined next steps: the roads advisory committee expects bids on the large upcoming project (streets named in the presentation included Tuman, Dartha, East, Fullerton, Skyline Drive and several smaller streets), staff will prepare a public-facing summary and the council planned a capstone workshop to present all city cost pressures and ask residents to prioritize which warrant general-fund support. Additional workshops were scheduled on related topics, including brush clearance, drones/aerial imagery/AI, CERT training, and fire-department planning.
Quotes from the meeting include: "The roads are the most valuable asset the city has," a resident said; staff noted that "asphalt costs rose from about $84 a ton to $142 a ton" across recent bid cycles. The workshop closed with a commitment to broaden outreach and return with more detailed numbers and a public prioritization session.
