Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals Court questions hearsay, notice and findings in probation‑violation appeal
Summary
In Camo v. Conpsion (25P723) the panel probed whether the probation‑revocation finding rested on substantially reliable hearsay (police reports), whether the defendant had notice of the restraining order, and whether written findings were adequate; counsel urged vacatur or remand.
The panel next heard argument in 25P723, Camo v. Conpsion, a challenge to a probation‑violation determination that relied heavily on police‑report hearsay.
Counsel for the defendant said six charges flowed from the conduct at issue and at least one resulting plea left collateral consequences on the defendant’s record. The principal legal dispute concerned whether the hearsay in the police report met the Durling factors for ‘‘substantial reliability’’ when it was the primary evidence for the violation, and whether the court’s checklist form and any scribbled entries on it…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
