Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Of Conduct topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Two Rivers council reviews slimmed‑down code of conduct, flags device rules and removal language

Two Rivers City Council · March 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members reviewed a condensed version of the city’s ethics/code of conduct, trimming a 14‑page policy to four pages. Members praised clarity but raised questions about electronic‑device rules and a removal provision that one member said remains anchored in state statute.

Two Rivers city council members reviewed a revised code of conduct on March 30 that reduces the document from 14 pages to four and replaces courtroom‑style complaint mechanics with a streamlined peer‑review approach.

The presenter told the council the rewrite was intended to simplify language and usability while preserving standards; the document removes requirements for sworn complaints, affidavits and cross‑examination and emphasizes basic principles for elected officials. “This revised version in front of you is moving away from a corporate style cross‑examination process toward a more common sense, workable, practical approach,” the presenter said.

The change prompted questions about origins and authority. Council members asked who drafted the update; the presenter replied legal counsel prepared the package based on the prior policy. One council member, Andrew (committee member), urged caution on deleting removal language, noting that the statutory authority remains: “That’s a statutory power. Like, you can take it out of here, but it’s the statute is still going to exist,” Andrew said, arguing that removing local text does not eliminate the state’s underlying authority.

Members also debated Section 6A on communications and technology. Councilor Adam Wachowski questioned provisions that could constrain reasonable use of personal phones during meetings and asked whether the code should specify narrower limits rather than punitive sanctions. Several members said they supported a streamlined policy that sets expectations without creating an onerous enforcement regime.

Council agreed to circulate the redline edits, make modest clarifying changes and bring the revised code back for formal action in early April so incoming council members can review and sign during orientation. The council did not vote on the code at the March 30 work session; staff will place the item on a future regular agenda for action.