Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission forwards Title 19 amendments on loading-bay definition and small-building design exception
Summary
On March 26 the commission recommended City Council approve two city-initiated Title 19 amendments: a new definition for 'loading bay' (Chapter 19.02) and an exception in Chapter 19.16 to spare small commercial buildings (under 15,000 sq ft or 200 ft frontage) from additional architectural standards intended for large warehouses.
Get email alerts on the Code Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Saratoga Springs Planning Commission on March 26 forwarded two city-initiated code amendments to the City Council: a new definition for "loading bay" in Chapter 19.02 of the Land Development Code and an amendment to Chapter 19.16 that exempts smaller office/warehouse and commercial buildings from additional architectural standards intended for large, campus-scale buildings.
Senior planner Austin Roy (agenda-listed) introduced the Chapter 19.02 amendment to define "loading bay," explaining the definition will clarify when a previously discussed landscaping exception should apply. Planner Kendall Black presented Chapter 19.16 changes and said the amendment is meant to avoid unintended consequences when the additional standards (corner accentuation and amenity zones) are applied to smaller multi-tenant retail or restaurant buildings; the proposal sets an exception for buildings no wider than 200 feet in frontage and no larger than 15,000 square feet so that standards designed for large warehouses do not unduly burden smaller commercial storefronts.
Commissioner Miles thanked staff for the clarifications, saying clearer definitions help applicants, citizens and staff. Commissioner Rather supported the Chapter 19.16 amendment, noting it addresses practical issues for small-business storefronts. Both amendments were moved and forwarded with findings and conditions in the staff report; motions passed unanimously.
The staff briefing included examples of buildings that would be affected by the change (liquor store, restaurants, small retail centers) and noted that other site and architectural standards would still apply; the amendment only removes the additional standards meant for very large buildings.

