Radnor parent says district delayed response after AI‑generated sexual images circulated; board seeks administrative regulations within two months

Audrey Greenberg, a Radnor resident, told the Radnor Township School District board on March 24 that her daughter and four other students were victims of sexually explicit images created with artificial intelligence and shared by peers, and that the district did not conduct its own investigation.

"This is not hypothetical. This resulted in real harm. It resulted in criminal charges," Greenberg said, later asking, "When will the administrative regulations be reviewed and updated alongside these policies?" She told the board the district had handed the situation to law enforcement, did not open a Title IX investigation and provided "little meaningful accountability" in school, leaving affected students without prompt supports.

Greenberg cited state law, saying, "Pennsylvania has already recognized the seriousness of this issue. Act 125 addresses AI‑generated sexual content involving minors." She urged the board to adopt administrative regulations that clearly define who must act, how quickly they must act, what immediate protections are required for students and how communication with families will be handled.

Board member Susan Dunn and others pressed for clarity about the timeline for administrative regulations and whether the district would consult outside experts. "What is the time frame for doing... the administrative regulations?" Dunn asked, noting the board does not routinely review administrative regulations and that stakeholders have raised the question during committee meetings.

Administration said it would draft the regulations internally with legal counsel, building‑level and district administration input and aim to complete them within the next two months. "We're hoping to have that within the next 2 months," Dr. Hand said when asked about timing.

The public commenters on March 24 also recommended external review. Morgan Dorfman, who spoke later in the meeting, asked whether the district would seek input from digital technology experts, outside law enforcement, independent legal counsel, mental‑health professionals and sexual‑trauma specialists as part of updating policy and practice.

The board did not take formal action on the policies that evening; several related policy revisions and one new "welcoming schools" policy were before the board for first reading, and the administration said it would return with administrative regulations for the board's information once drafted.

Next steps: the administration expects to complete draft administrative regulations in about two months and return to the board; parents at the meeting asked that the district include external experts and clear procedures for investigations and student protections.