Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Decisions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves audit, construction managers and several administrative actions

Shelby County Board of Education · March 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Shelby County Board of Education approved multiple procurement and administrative items by voice vote, including the 2025–2026 audit services contract, construction management awards for East Middle School and farm projects, approval of unmet needs, the 2026–27 discipline code and several grant/participation items.

At its meeting, the Shelby County Board of Education approved a package of procurement and administrative actions by voice vote.

On audit services, the board voted to award the 2025–2026 audit contract to Denise King, CPA after the evaluation committee cited qualifications and past performance; board discussion noted limited bidders and prior auditors withdrawing from the work. The board approved the motion by voice vote.

The board also approved contracting Alliance Corporation as the construction manager (and GC‑capable firm) for the East Middle School project and Rising Sun for the district’s farm projects. Board members said both firms have relevant experience and that the selection process considered firm qualifications and capacity to avoid over‑concentrating multiple projects with a single manager.

Other approved items included the consent agenda (with several items pulled for separate discussion), approval of the submitted unmet‑needs list, adoption of the 2026–2027 student discipline code so online registration could be enabled, approval to pursue a No Kid Hungry summer feeding grant to expand sites and days, and permission to participate in a WIDA model research study for multilingual‑learner programming. Where votes were recorded the board used voice votes and did not elicit roll‑call tallies in the transcript.

What the votes mean: staff may proceed with contracting and implementation steps for the awarded vendors, bring pricing for identified unmet needs back to the board for any supplemental approvals, and advance grant or research participation steps as authorized.