Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears Council of Great City Schools coaching proposal; members debate cost and next steps
Summary
Ray Hart of the Council of Great City Schools proposed three governance-support options (a short workshop, a two-day workshop, and a two-year coaching engagement). Board members questioned cost, logistics and timing and asked for follow-up; no final contract vote was taken.
Get email alerts on the Governance Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Little Rock School District board heard a presentation from Ray Hart, executive director of the Council of Great City Schools, on March 19 outlining options for board governance support ranging from a one-off workshop to a two-year coaching engagement.
Hart described three tiers of service: a four- to five-hour workshop led by a subject-matter expert, a two-day "student outcomes–focused" workshop and an extended two-year coaching model that includes the two-day workshop plus ongoing coaching and implementation support. He cited research and district examples showing that boards engaged in extended coaching can yield larger student-achievement improvements than boards receiving only initial training. As Hart put it, "student outcomes don't change until adult behaviors change."
Board members pressed for concrete examples of how the coaching translates into improved student outcomes and discussed cost and scheduling constraints. Director Eugene Kips Kitsky asked for specific outcomes and return-on-investment examples; Hart cited district cases and committed to share supporting materials and research. Board members expressed a range of views: some endorsed the idea of multi-year coaching as an investment in governance; others suggested lower-cost local retreats or trying a shorter workshop first. Hart said he would honor an earlier, lower-priced contracting arrangement for LRSD if the board chose to proceed on that basis.
No contract or motion was finalized at the meeting. Several directors suggested an intermediate step: a facilitated local retreat or a short workshop to build initial cohesion, followed by consideration of a longer coaching engagement. Staff said they would reissue related procurement documents where applicable and return with schedule/cost options for board consideration.

