Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Solar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jefferson County adopts solar‑energy ordinance with soil and battery‑storage safeguards after lengthy debate
Summary
After extensive debate over setbacks, prime soil protections and battery storage safety, the board adopted a new solar energy ordinance (with committee‑approved exceptions and added soil‑testing and cleanup provisions); the ordinance passed by roll call (24 yes, 4 no, 1 abstain, 1 absent).
The Jefferson County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance to regulate ground‑mounted solar energy systems and battery energy storage after a lengthy committee review and a contested floor debate.
Planning and Zoning Committee chair Supervisor Jacob presented the ordinance, saying it responds to increasing solar development inquiries and aims to provide clear local rules for both small and large projects. Several supervisors raised concerns about how the ordinance treats prime agricultural soils, long setbacks from residences, and height limits for ground‑mounted equipment. Supervisor Turville Heights offered amendments to allow exceptions for existing farmed, tiled wetlands and to add soil testing and post‑incident cleanup standards for battery energy storage systems; those amendments drew support from other supervisors and were approved by the board.
Supporters of the ordinance said local rules are needed because state law does not comprehensively address battery‑storage safety and because the county needs permitting standards for the many inquiries it has received. Opponents and some supervisors warned the ordinance’s prime‑soil limits and 500‑ to 700‑foot setback provisions could make many county parcels unusable for solar projects. During debate planners and supervisors noted the ordinance allows the Planning & Zoning Committee to consider mitigation measures and grant exceptions in specific cases.
The motion to adopt the ordinance passed on a roll‑call vote recorded at the meeting (24 yes, 4 no, 1 abstain, 1 absent). The ordinance includes provisions requiring baseline soil testing and contingency cleanup standards for residual contamination following fires or leaks at battery storage facilities.
What’s next: Planning staff and the committee will administer the new rules, evaluate exception requests, and monitor implementation; supervisors noted the ordinance can be amended as the board gains experience.
