Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Field House Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chelsea board approves field house construction after design update and cost questions
Summary
After a presentation from Clark and Brand Construction detailing a larger footprint and site constraints, the Chelsea School District Board approved the field house construction project unanimously. Board members pressed presenters on storm-sewer relocation, access and long‑term maintenance.
The Chelsea School District Board of Education unanimously approved construction of a new field house on May 4 after hearing design updates and cost considerations from district-contracted builders.
Consultants from Clark Construction and Brand Construction told the board the revised plan increases the building width to 195 feet to accommodate a full-width field, relocates restrooms outboard of the mezzanine to maximize interior space, and limits translucent facade panels to the north to control cost. Chris Martin, senior project manager for Clark Construction, warned that a 20-foot storm sewer crossing the planned footprint makes rerouting impractical within the current budget and estimated reroute work at about $4 million.
"We found a storm sewer right over top of the proposed building," Martin said, describing options to work around the utility or defer relocation to a future bond project. Neil Danshorn, presented as president of Brand Construction, outlined material choices meant to balance durability and cost: masonry up to 8 feet for impact resistance and insulated metal panels above, with selected translucent panels to provide ambient daylight where cost-effective.
Board members pressed on accessibility and site access. Trustees asked whether restroom and storage areas could double as storm‑shelter structures and raised concerns about the building’s pedestrian route from the nearest parking area. The construction team said the facility will meet current code requirements for egress and that future sidewalks or more pronounced north‑side entrances could be scoped into later bond dollars if usage patterns demand it.
Superintendent recommendation and vote District staff presented an action item for board approval of the construction contract and budget package. During the discussion staff clarified that accessories inside the field house (netting, batting cages and temporary pads) were budgeted separately (approximately $106,330), and that turf and other field accessories are included in the project package.
After additional technical questions and assurances about phasing and community and athletic access during construction, the board voted to approve the field house project. The board recorded the vote as 6–0; the motion carried.
What comes next According to presenters, construction drawings were near completion and the team expects to file for building permits once drawings are finalized; state review was estimated at eight to 12 weeks. The team proposed a late‑summer start (September) with steel erection over the winter and interior fit‑out through the following spring, timed to have usable space for upcoming athletic seasons.
The proponents emphasized the design’s allowance for future expansion to the south and said the current package was intended to provide a functional, durable facility within the current funding envelope while preserving options for later enhancements.
The board approved the item during the May 4 meeting; staff said related auxiliary access and site adjustments will be monitored during construction and may be proposed for follow‑on bond or sinking‑fund work if usage patterns and budgets warrant it.
