Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Ankle Monitoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Blair County approves amendment to add ankle-monitoring services for prison program after debate over costs and logistics
Summary
Blair County commissioners on May 7 approved an amendment adding electronic ankle-monitoring services for the county prison program; commissioners pressed staff on device counts, who will fit and monitor bracelets, vendor turnaround and training before voting to approve.
The Blair County Board of Commissioners on Thursday, May 7, 2026, approved an amendment to a services agreement to add electronic ankle-monitoring and monitoring services for the Blair County prison program effective May 8, 2026, after extended discussion about costs, device availability and who would place and monitor the devices.
The amendment, described in the meeting as an amendment to an agreement with Digital Net America LLC, was presented during staff reports. Scott Dalton, introduced at the start of staff reports, explained the county had been evaluating three tiers of monitoring offered by a vendor referred to in discussion as "VigilNet." Dalton said the vendor would provide training and monitoring; he added staff had secured funding for the program but were still working through operational details.
Why it matters: commissioners said the program is intended to reduce the county jail population while maintaining public safety, but they pressed staff to avoid overpaying for equipment that would sit unused. The board emphasized the county needs clarity on how many monitors will actually be used and which county agency will be responsible for fitting and first-line responses to violations.
Key details and debate
- Device counts and taxpayer impact: The chair warned against buying more devices than needed, saying the district attorney had initially identified roughly 20 people who might need monitoring but that number could fall to about 12 after court processing. "So we're still trying to figure out how many bracelets we need because all of this has an impact on the taxpayers," the chair said.
- Who fits and who monitors: Commissioners discussed multiple options for placing bracelets — corrections staff at the prison, adult probation, or the sheriff's department — and said the sheriff's office, in conjunction with DA detectives, would handle apprehension when people violate monitoring conditions.
- Vendor logistics and training: Dalton said the vendor offered three monitoring tiers and would conduct training for county staff. On training time, a county presenter said the vendor "said about an hour, but I would schedule two just to be safe." Dalton also noted vendor turnaround for devices is typically "three to four days," sometimes up to a week if the vendor pulls inventory from other counties.
- Funding: At the meeting Dalton said the county has secured funding for the service; the board did not provide a unit price or total procurement amount on the record during discussion.
Vote and next steps
The board voted to approve the amendment; the chair called for the vote and recorded ayes. Commissioners directed staff to finalize operational logistics with the vendor, clarify how many devices to procure based on court-verified need, and schedule vendor training before full deployment.
The county's next procedural steps noted at the meeting included finalizing which local office will fit devices and documenting training and replenishment processes; no procurement contract details or exact purchase counts were recorded during the public meeting.
