Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves revised COA allowing demolition and redesigned 7‑story building at 327 South New Street (4–3)
Summary
After HCC review and debate over preserving an Italianate facade, Bethlehem City Council voted 4–3 to approve a new Certificate of Appropriateness that allows demolition of the last contributing facade and replaces an earlier 2021 approval with a redesigned 7‑story mixed‑use project on South New Street.
Bethlehem City Council voted 4–3 on May 5 to approve a revised Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for 327 South New Street that allows demolition of four existing structures and removes the requirement to retain one previously saved facade.
Council discussed the project's history: a prior COA from June 2021 authorized demolition but required retention of a particular facade; the applicant later submitted a revised design and argued that retaining the facade presented structural and economic hardship. The Historic Conservation Commission reviewed the application and unanimously recommended the new COA, citing technical challenges and an updated design that reduces the building from an earlier 9‑story proposal to a 7‑story structure with ground‑floor retail.
During council discussion, members questioned the gap between approvals and construction and whether property owners have an obligation to maintain facades while projects await completion. City staff said the block had long been a redevelopment priority and that the structures approved for demolition were already in poor condition; staff also noted changes in ownership and project scale over the intervening years.
The roll call on the COA produced the following votes: Mister Raymond — Aye; Mister Callahan — Aye; Mister Colon — Aye; Miss Daniels — Nay; Miss Kwiatek — Aye; Miss Laird — Nay; Miss Leon — Nay. The measure passed 4–3.
Supporters of the revised COA said the updated design addresses prior concerns, reduces overall height and massing compared with the 2021 plan, and that retaining the particular facade was infeasible. Opponents said the change erodes historic context and raised broader concerns about "demolition by neglect" when approvals are not acted upon promptly.
The approval replaces the earlier COA; council members and staff said the demolition authorized by prior approvals was already in place and that the new vote amends preservation conditions rather than authorizing additional demolition beyond the previously approved scope.
Council did not attach additional conditions in the vote; council members asked staff to track future design details and to provide historical documentation where practicable.
