Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances FY27 capital construction adjustment after extended committee review
Summary
The Vermont Senate moved H.952 (the FY27 capital construction and bonding adjustment) to third reading after committee reporters outlined reallocations, a $160.4 million Senate project total, and provisions to monitor implementation; senators asked for additional detail on courthouse ownership, bond premiums and EV charging changes.
Get email alerts on the Capital Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate voted to propose amendments and ordered third reading of H.952, the FY27 capital construction and state bond budget adjustment, after a detailed institutions committee briefing on the bill’s spreadsheet and project reallocations.
Senator (Windham District), reporting for the Committee on Institutions, told colleagues the governor’s recommended total for projects was $158,986,915, the House-approved total was $159,550,328 and the Senate institutions recommendation totaled $160,419,178. The senator said the difference largely reflects prior-year allocations that were not spent (roughly $44 million), bond premiums (about $14 million) and interest on cash ($1.8 million).
Why it matters: the bill updates the two‑year capital program adopted as Act 33 and addresses FY27 projects and bonded dollars, including major maintenance for state buildings, corrections facility repairs and funding for nonprofit recovery housing and stormwater projects.
Key committee changes and clarifications included restoring $2 million in funding for door controls at correctional facilities after a contract was signed, converting some previously bond‑funded spend to cash (for example, adding $1,000,000 in cash for stormwater compliance projects), adding $598,650 in bonds and $500,000 in cash for renovations at the Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility, and allocating $220,000 for Recovery House headquarters repairs. The committee also added $25,000 to the State House entryway project to plan a second‑floor egress and proposed a special committee to oversee entryway spending.
Senators pressed for details. A senator from Chittenden asked the institutions reporter to confirm which courthouse projects are state‑owned and which are county‑owned and whether counties have met their required funding contributions; the reporter agreed to supply that information before third reading. Senators also questioned the $13 million in bond premium the reporter noted; the reporter and other senators explained the premium reflects purchasers paying above par when Vermont bonds are in demand and that premium figures are included on the spreadsheet.
On bonding: the committee reiterated it follows the Capital Debt Affordability Committee (CDAC) recommendation of $100 million in general obligation bonding over the biennium (commonly shown as $50 million per year), but observed that total project costs exceed that because cash, bond premiums and reallocated prior funding are also included in the project totals.
Next steps: the Senate’s amendments as recommended by the Committee on Institutions, as modified by Appropriations, were adopted for the purpose of noticing. The bill was ordered to third reading; committee staff will provide follow‑up detail on courthouse ownership, the restoration of certain line items and decisions on EV charging station funding.
Sources: committee reports and floor exchanges at the institutions committee presentation and subsequent finance and appropriations reports. The institutions committee vote on its recommendations was recorded as 5‑0‑0.

