Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fontana planners review Prologis industrial commerce center design; motion to approve recorded

Fontana Planning Commission · January 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Fontana Planning Commission reviewed a design for a proposed Prologis Industrial Commerce Center at 14970 Jurupa Avenue — a roughly 492,000-square-foot building on about 22 acres — and the commission recorded and passed a motion related to a master case and municipal code amendment.

The Fontana Planning Commission on Jan. 20 reviewed a proposal for the Prologis Industrial Commerce Center at 14970 Jurupa Avenue, a project presenter described as a roughly 492,000-square-foot industrial building on about 22 acres.

Planner Rena Young presented the design review, saying the building would sit on the south portion of the site with landscape buffers along the south, west and east, truck loading docks on the north and separate driveways for passenger vehicles to the south. Young described façade elements including glazed windows, metal canopies, cornices and varied heights intended to break up the massing and a nighttime rendering shown to the commission.

The presenter also noted the site is currently occupied by a steel products storage business; the applicant materials describe the development as an industrial commerce center with associated site improvements.

After the presentation the chair closed the public hearing and the record shows one request to speak from Western States Carpenters. A speaker on the record stated a motion "to approve master case number 25-0080 and municipal code amendment number 25-0011," the motion was seconded, and the chair announced the motion passed with all in favor. The transcript contains inconsistent case numbers between the item announced for public hearing earlier in the meeting (master case 24-30-0037; design review 24-0013) and the motion as spoken; the motion text above is recorded verbatim from the meeting transcript.

The commission did not record additional conditions, mitigation measures, or a roll-call listing of individual votes in the transcript beyond the chair's announcement that the motion passed. The meeting adjourned with the commission noting its next regular meeting on Feb. 3, 2026.