Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge action on brewery noise, generator fumes and unrepaired mailboxes
Summary
Multiple residents told the council they face ongoing noise, generator fumes and parking problems tied to a nearby brewery and taco truck; callers asked the city to enforce a prior minor-use permit (citing noise standard section 17.66.0.05) and to investigate an alleged improper police towing/impound action.
Several residents used public comment to press the city to enforce conditions tied to the Hamilton Brewery and to address other neighborhood problems.
One speaker described repeated mailbox break-ins at Mountainside Apartments on Timberline Lane and said residents have repeatedly traveled to the post office for months because mailbox repairs were delayed. "It's been five months since they've repaired this mailbox," the commenter said, calling the added trips a hardship for seniors.
Other speakers focused on Hamilton Brewery. An unnamed resident said brewery patrons and associated food trucks were parking in restricted and senior-parking areas, producing loud noise and generator fumes that enter windows at night. "The noise is so loud ... I can't get my sleep," a caller reading on behalf of Gail Walker said, saying the disturbance made her health worse and that she feared becoming homeless if forced to move.
Matthew Gracia read a statement for Dr. Laura Espinosa pressing the council to exercise stricter administrative oversight. He specifically urged the council to "strictly interpret and enforce section 17.66.0.05 (noise standards) of the minor use permit." Gracia asked the council to correct the permitting process that he said was not handled with sufficient diligence.
A different commenter alleged that a police officer used a badge to secure the release of a family member’s car from an impound yard; the speaker asked the council to investigate whether preferential treatment occurred. That allegation was made in public comment; no police representative responded during the meeting.
Council did not take an immediate enforcement vote on the matter during the meeting; staff and council members acknowledged the concerns and the item was not placed on the consent calendar for formal action at that time.
