Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tri Valley board hears $39.6 million budget proposal, contingency if voters reject plan

Tri Valley Central School District Board of Education · May 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Assistant Superintendent for Business Jeff Froelich presented a $39.6 million budget — a 4% increase — with most spending in student programs; the board reviewed revenue sources, contingency rules if voters reject the plan, and took questions on reserves and BOCES career programs.

Assistant Superintendent for Business Jeff Froelich presented the Tri Valley Central School District's proposed $39,600,000 budget for the coming year, describing it as a roughly 4% increase (about $1.5 million) over the current year and noting that the largest share is the program component at about $30,800,000.

Froelich, who identified himself as the district's new assistant superintendent for business, broke the budget into the three required components: a capital component (about $4.0 million), an administrative component (about $4.6 million) and the program component, which covers teacher salaries, benefits and student-facing programs. On revenue, he said the two largest sources are the tax levy (about $22.2'$22.8 million, a roughly 2.9% increase) and state aid (about $12.5 million), noting a modest $80,000 increase in foundation aid and some declines in expense-based aids.

Froelich explained contingency options if the budget is voted down: the board may re-submit a revised budget to voters, or if the budget fails twice (the transcript notes a June 19 follow-up), the district would be required to adopt a contingent budget, which cannot raise the tax levy above the current amount and would require roughly $664,000 in additional reductions under the contingency scenario.

Board members asked for clarifications on administrative headcount, capital-reserve funding and specific line-item differences labeled "instruction" versus "teaching." Froelich said he would provide exact administrative staffing numbers and confirmed the district maintains a capital reserve that can be funded at year-end if funds are available. He also detailed career and technical offerings available through BOCES, including welding, automotive, carpentry and heavy equipment programs.

The presentation emphasized that only a small portion of the $39.6 million budget is discretionary (roughly $2.0 million), with the majority committed to salaries, benefits and fixed costs such as transportation and utilities. Froelich summarized: “Overall, the budget, as you can see, is 39,600,000, which is a 4% increase or about 1,500,000 over the current year.”

Next steps: the district will present the proposed budget to voters on the ballot date referenced by the board (the transcript records a vote scheduled for the nineteenth); if the budget is defeated twice the contingency budget would take effect. The board took no final adoption vote on the budget at this meeting; the hearing served to inform voters and collect questions.