Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: De Pere council advances Newland terms, approves resolutions and ICE center lease amendment
Summary
At its May 5 meeting the De Pere Common Council advanced development terms with Newland Enterprises (TID 18), approved multiple resolutions including a development agreement authorization for Ninth Street Development LLC and a fourth amendment to the Brown County Ice Management lease for the De Pere Ice Recreation Center.
The De Pere Common Council on May 5 took several formal actions:
- Development‑agreement terms for Newland Enterprises (Lockside, 100 South Broadway block, TID 18): Council approved a motion to advance negotiation of terms to a formal development agreement (roll call recorded Aye: Gantz, Hansen, Conagher, Ledvina, Nelson, Pierock, Hill, Mayor Boyd). The motion moves the project to additional technical steps (ALTA survey, environmental testing, traffic impact analysis and final site plan review).
- Resolutions (Item 9 C and D): Council suspended the rules and approved resolutions C and D by roll call (no substantive opposition recorded during the brief consideration).
- Resolution 2633 (Ninth Street Development LLC): Council approved authorization of a development agreement with Ninth Street Development LLC for parcel WDD002004; staff clarified expected term and revenue assumptions and projected incremental revenue.
- Fourth amendment to Brown County Ice Management lease (De Pere Ice Recreation Center): Council approved a contract amendment that reconfigures some management and programming terms, including weekly open skate timing and a restructured approach to advertising/sponsorship revenue; staff clarified revenue flows and the city’s oversight of sponsorship sales moving forward.
All referenced motions and resolutions passed by the votes recorded in the meeting. Several items were routine appointments, consent items and event permits that were approved by motion with no roll‑call objections.
