Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses Hall Avenue upzone after earlier 5 to' vote accepting hearing examiner recommendation
Summary
Staff said the council previously voted 5 to' to accept the hearing examiner's recommendation to rezone two Hall Avenue parcels from R2 to R3; at the Feb. 24 meeting several council members reiterated concerns about neighborhood compatibility, burden of proof and deferred safety mitigations.
The council revisited public concerns and council debate over a proposed rezoning of two parcels at 1061 and 1083 Hall Avenue on Feb. 24 after staff reminded the public the hearing on substance was closed at the prior meeting.
Background: Staff said 1909 Holdings LLC requested a site-specific rezone of about 2.7 acres from R2 to R3. The hearing examiner issued a final recommendation after correcting minor citation errors, and at the prior closed-record hearing the council voted 5 to 2 to accept the examiner's recommendation and directed staff to prepare an ordinance to amend the zoning map.
Council debate at the Feb. 24 meeting focused on five recurring concerns raised in the record: whether the applicant met the burden of proof for a legislative upzone, deferred public-safety and transportation mitigations that the examiner left to later project review, the availability of adequate R3 capacity elsewhere, compatibility with existing single-family and middle-housing character, and whether granting R3 would permit high-density apartment development inconsistent with neighborhood scale.
Council member statements on the record argued that a rezone is legislative and that the applicant bears the burden to show the upzone serves public health, safety and welfare now, not in future permitting. Staff clarified that the substantive hearing was closed previously and that tonight's agenda item was the ordinance adoption stage; council members remain free to vote for or against the ordinance.
Why it matters: The decision affects allowable housing types and density on those parcels, with potential implications for neighborhood character and future apartment development. Several council members signaled they remain unconvinced the record established the necessity for R3.
What's next: Staff had prepared an ordinance consistent with the earlier direction; council discussion on Feb. 24 addressed compatibility and due-process issues. The transcript records the earlier 5 to' acceptance of the examiner's recommendation and extended debate; a final ordinance adoption vote is a distinct council action and the transcript segment here reflects debate and clarification about process and the timing of votes.
