Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utility Policies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee supports staff recommendation for percent-based water-leak credit with high-dollar cap and reporting

Port Orchard Finance Committee · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended replacing the $100 flat leak-credit with a percent-based credit; committee supported a staff-recommended 75% credit of the leak portion but added a $5,000 cap for very large bills and asked for quarterly reporting on program impacts.

The finance committee reviewed city policy for water-leak credits, which staff said was last updated in 1996 and currently allows a maximum $100 adjustment. Noah Crocker explained that modern radio meters and continuous-flow monitoring reduce detection times but that some customers still face large bills from undetected leaks.

Staff recommended moving to a percent-based credit—specifically, a 75% credit applied to the portion of the bill attributable to the leak—citing examples that showed a substantial reduction in customer liability versus the $100 cap. For a hypothetical account with a normal three-year average bill of about $143 and a leak-driven bill of $770, a $100 cap would leave the customer responsible for $670; a 75% credit would reduce the customer’s share to about $300.

Committee members expressed concern about very large commercial or irrigation-related breaks that could produce multi-thousand-dollar bills. Members proposed adding a high-dollar cap and a review path for extraordinary cases; the group ultimately supported a 75% leak-credit policy with a $5,000 maximum credit and asked staff to provide quarterly reporting on program usage and fiscal impact. Members discussed referral or adjudication for account balances far above a customer’s normal bill but emphasized keeping the primary rule formulaic to avoid subjective casework whenever possible.

Staff will draft ordinance or code changes and include the 75%/up-to-$5,000 framework and return to the committee with recommended language and an implementation timeline.