Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Battery Stewardship topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance panel advances battery stewardship bill to create producer-funded recycling program

Finance - Division I (House) · March 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Finance committee recommended passage of HB16002 (as amended), a producer-funded battery stewardship program to centralize safe collection and recycling of lithium and other rechargeable batteries; supporters cited fire-risk incidents and municipal disposal costs, while opponents had fiscal and administrative questions.

The Finance Division I voted 5–3 to recommend passage, as amended, of HB16002, a bill to establish a producer-funded battery stewardship program to collect and recycle spent batteries (including lithium-ion) and reduce fire hazards in waste and recycling operations.

Sponsor Representative Evil described recent fires at waste facilities and municipal costs for safe disposal of problematic batteries, saying stewardship would provide free, statewide collection paid by producers rather than local governments. Supporters included the state fire marshal, the Professional Firefighters of New Hampshire, waste management companies and solid-waste district representatives who documented costly fires and disposal events.

The sponsor said the model mirrors other stewardship programs (for paint, electronics and other materials) and would not permit a point-of-sale surcharge to retailers; instead, producers would pool costs into a national producer-organization program, which spreads costs broadly and should not materially change consumer battery prices. The sponsor provided a comparative estimate (Vermont’s program startup ~ $650,000) and argued that New Hampshire’s share would be immaterial for national producers while saving municipalities thousands of dollars annually.

Opponents and some members pressed for clarity on administrative start-up costs and the exact mechanism for covering program administration; the sponsor and representatives of the stewardship network said the program reimburses state administrative costs and that start-up estimates are modest compared with the benefits of preventing fires and removing toxic waste from the waste stream.

What happens next: The committee’s amended-passage recommendation advances HB16002 to full Finance; sponsors will coordinate implementation details with the Department of Environmental Services and producer stewardship organizations.