Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Playground Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews NES playground bids and drainage fixes; vendor can scale design to $320,000
Summary
A playground specialist told supervisors that a $320,000 budget (including $126,000 on hand plus proposed additional funds) can be met by value engineering; the consultant recommended poured-in-place surfacing and drainage fixes to address standing-water concerns and said summer installation is feasible if ordered promptly.
Get email alerts on the Playground Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Northumberland Board of Supervisors reviewed options for an elementary-school playground and heard from an on-line playground specialist (Joe) about design, accessibility and costs on May 7. Board members confirmed a starting playground balance of roughly $126,000 and discussed adding up to $200,000 from other available CIP funds to reach a workable construction budget.
Joe said all playground designs proposed would meet ADA, ASTM and CPSC standards and explained surfacing choices: poured-in-place rubber reduces annual maintenance compared with loose-fill wood fiber but costs more up front. He estimated a full preferred design at roughly the higher end of proposals but offered ways to value-engineer the plan to meet a $320,000 target by reducing poured-in-place square footage or substituting alternate equipment.
Board members raised repeated concerns about drainage in the existing playground footprint. Joe recommended a mitigation package — removal of decomposed mulch, a 6-inch stone subbase, a French drain along the existing curb, regrading and minor saw-cut reliefs — that he said would reduce standing-water problems; he provided a line-item drainage estimate for the proposal and said the poured-in-place plus described drainage work would likely solve the issues. He also said the vendor could relocate the playground to a better-draining site if the board preferred, but that would require surveying and would likely delay construction.
For schedule, Joe told the board he could meet a summer installation window if the county moved quickly to order equipment; new equipment lead times have improved and projects are being scheduled for summer. The board asked Joe to provide a site drawing and equipment list scaled to a $320,000 budget and to work with the superintendent’s office so the board could evaluate a final plan at the upcoming CIP public hearing.
The board did not vote to finalize funding at the meeting; members directed staff to obtain a site plan for the $320,000 scenario and to revisit the playground at the CIP hearing.

