Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Minimum Wage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee rejects advancing state minimum-wage bill, debate highlights regional comparisons and labor-market concerns
Summary
The subcommittee debated HB1484, which would set a state minimum wage rising to $17; members argued about economic impacts, benefit cliffs, and regional parity. The committee voted ITL (inexpedient to legislate) and did not advance the bill.
Lawmakers engaged in an extended debate over HB1484, a proposal to establish a state minimum wage with incremental increases. Proponents argued New Hampshire's current minimum (federal level) is outdated and that raising wages would help households afford housing, food and health care; they cited neighboring states' higher minima. Opponents warned of job loss, wage compression and unintended effects on small businesses.
Sponsor comments and discussion focused on multiple technical issues: how the bill would interact with tip and salaried employees, benefit cliffs that can reduce net household income, and possible floor amendments to preserve existing statutory language. Representative Granger and others described the proposal as having strong constituency support; Representative Flanigan and others pointed to market-driven wage increases and local examples where employers already pay $17 or more for entry-level positions.
After debate and a recorded roll call, the committee adopted the motion of ITL (inexpedient to legislate) for HB1484; committee members and staff were asked to prepare majority/minority reports and to continue discussions about economic analysis and alternatives.
